Find the gap in your defenses before someone else does.
B4Q's VAPT engagements combine automated vulnerability scanning with hands-on, ethical penetration testing across your network, web applications, mobile apps, and cloud infrastructure — so exploitable gaps surface on a report, not in a breach notification.
- Network, web, mobile & cloud coverage
- Manual exploitation, not scan-only
- Maps to SOC 2, ISO 27001 & HIPAA
A scanner finds what's known. A human finds what's exploitable.
Automated vulnerability scanning is fast and broad — it flags outdated software, missing patches, and known CVEs across your environment. But scanners can't chain weaknesses together the way an attacker would, and they generate false positives that waste your team's time chasing non-issues.
Penetration testing is where a security professional manually attempts to exploit what the scan found — and often what it didn't — to show you which findings are actually dangerous, and which are just noise.
- 01 Separates real, exploitable risk from scanner noise and false positives.
- 02 Satisfies VAPT requirements baked into SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS.
- 03 Produces a prioritized, remediation-ready report — not a raw scan dump.
Four attack surfaces. One coordinated engagement.
Most environments span more than one surface — we scope and test them together so findings on one don't get missed because of a gap on another.
Network VAPT
Internal and external network testing — firewalls, servers, and exposed services probed for misconfigurations and exploitable entry points.
Web Application VAPT
OWASP Top 10-aligned testing of your web apps — injection, broken auth, access control, and business-logic flaws.
Mobile Application VAPT
iOS and Android testing covering local data storage, API communication, authentication, and reverse-engineering resistance.
Cloud Infrastructure VAPT
AWS, Azure, and GCP configuration review plus exploitation attempts against IAM, storage, and network security groups.
How much do we know going in?
The amount of information we start with changes what the test proves — each approach answers a different question about your defenses.
Black Box Testing
We start with no internal knowledge of your environment — the same position an external attacker would be in, simulating a real-world attack from the outside.
- Closest simulation of an actual external attacker
- Tests what's visible from outside your perimeter
- More time spent on reconnaissance than exploitation
Grey Box Testing
We're given partial information — perhaps a standard user account or basic architecture diagram — simulating an insider threat or an attacker who's gained a foothold.
- Simulates a malicious insider or compromised account
- Balances realism with efficient coverage
- Most common approach for web application VAPT
White Box Testing
We're given full access — source code, architecture diagrams, credentials — for the deepest possible review of logic flaws and design weaknesses.
- Most thorough coverage of code-level logic flaws
- No time lost to reconnaissance or guesswork
- Best suited for pre-release or high-assurance reviews
From scoping to a report your team can actually act on.
A disciplined process that moves from reconnaissance through exploitation to a prioritized, remediation-ready report — and confirms the fixes actually worked.
Scoping & Rules of Engagement
We define targets, testing windows, and boundaries in writing before any testing begins, protecting production systems.
Reconnaissance
Open-source intelligence gathering and enumeration to map your attack surface the way a real adversary would.
Vulnerability Scanning
Automated scanning across in-scope assets to identify known weaknesses, misconfigurations, and outdated components.
Manual Exploitation
A security professional manually attempts to exploit findings and chain weaknesses together, proving real-world impact.
Reporting & Risk Prioritization
Findings are rated by severity and business impact, with clear, actionable remediation guidance for each one.
Retesting
Once fixes are deployed, we retest affected findings and confirm closure before the engagement is considered complete.
Every finding comes with a severity, not just a description.
Ratings consider both exploitability and business impact, so your team knows what to fix first.
Critical
Remotely exploitable, no authentication required — full compromise or data exposure possible. Fix immediately.
High
Significant exploitability or impact, often requiring some conditions to be met. Fix on an urgent timeline.
Medium
Limited impact or harder to exploit on its own, but often chainable with other findings. Remediate on schedule.
Low
Best-practice or hardening recommendations with minimal standalone risk. Address as time allows.
VAPT isn't just good hygiene — it's often a requirement.
If you're pursuing any of these, VAPT is likely a stated or de facto requirement, and we coordinate the testing with the rest of your compliance work.
Testing from a team that also builds your compliance program.
Because we also deliver SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA engagements, VAPT findings get mapped straight into the controls work you're already doing.
Manual, Not Just Automated
Every engagement includes hands-on exploitation attempts, not a rebranded scanner report.
Compliance-Mapped Reporting
Findings are cross-referenced to SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA controls when those engagements are already underway.
Free Retesting Included
Once you've remediated, we retest affected findings at no additional charge before closing the engagement.
Clear, Written Rules of Engagement
Scope and boundaries are agreed in writing up front, so testing never puts production systems at risk.
50+ Businesses Served
Across network, web, mobile, and cloud engagements of varying scope and complexity.
96% Client Retention
Clients return for annual testing cycles with the same team that already knows their environment.
VAPT, answered.
Ready to find out what an attacker would find first?
Book a free scoping call and we'll map the right testing approach to your network, apps, and infrastructure.